Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree?

There is a view that particular subjects,

such

as mathematics and

philosophy

, are challenging to learn. Because of the difficulty, some people tend to propose both of these as not mandatory subjects in the school’s

curriculum

. In my opinion, mathematics is more reasonable to be a compulsory subject than

philosophy

. With regard to mathematics, it is essential to acknowledge that its content principle is basic knowledge of all of the numerical-based subjects in the whole

curriculum

system. The reason for

this

is that the calculation method will be applied and combined with other theories. To illustrate, it is almost impossible for physics’ students to measure and predict several phenomena in

this

world without

this

skill.

As a result

, failed to master in mathematics will systemically obstruct the learning process in the future. As for

philosophy

,

this

subject will enlighten our understanding of the way people think and the fundamental reason for our existence. In spite of important, it does not contribute significantly to the learning curve of the student in overall subjects.

Consequently

, these materials are more relevant if the school sets it as a required subject before taking the

next

relevant lesson,

such

as sociology and religion. Proposing

philosophy

as mandatory only in the conditional

curriculum

because it just affects on few topics that force the student to rethink what our life is about. To sum up, considering the impact on the whole learning concept, a justification to force people to study mathematics is more acceptable than reinforcing to insert

philosophy

in every

curriculum

. The

last

, the most crucial action for the

next

is finding the best strategy to increase the absorbing level of numerical knowledge in every learner.