Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There are differing opinions on whether the law should enforce the same verdict for similar crimes regardless of the motivation and circumstantial evidence or not.
This
debate is due to different schools of thought regarding the matter. I personally believe that punishments should vary according to the situation of crime. On one hand, the proponents of equal punishment advocate that if the penalty is same to everyone committing the same violation, it will be uniform. The legislation will be clearer and everyone will be aware of what will happen on breaking the rule. Whether someone kills with intention or by accident, it will be equal sentence. Whether the offender is convicted for the
first
time or the tenth time, the punishment will be same. People committing breach by chance are vulnerable to tougher sentences. While
on the other hand
, many believe that circumstances should be taken into account. A professional criminal creating a plot and committing the misdeed for a clear motive should be punished differently to someone who committed the same misconduct by chance or for the
first
instance.
This
provision enables stricter measures for re-offending and serious offence while circumstantially benign criminals get a lesser punishment.
However
,
this
method is
also
not without drawbacks. More affluent people might try to play with
such
provision and attempt to escape the sentence by creating a favourable scene to prove that the crime is circumstantial and not with a motive. Law enforcing authorities are prone to be biased and chances of corruption are higher. In conclusion, the law should consider the circumstances of the crime and individualize the sentence rather than enforcing a universal approach.
Submitted by mpkafle on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: