International travel is becoming cheaper, and several countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Whether the development of international

tourism

should be stimulated or

not has sparked

Suggestion

is not sparking

isn't sparking

doesn't spark

does not spark

heated debate in the recent decade because of environmental degradation. Personally, I firmly believe that the advantages of welcoming foreign tourists are more significant than its disadvantages. The global travel industry plays a crucial role in the economic growth of many countries.

Firstly

, it is an important source for the generation of employment. An increased number of companies producing specialities, restaurants, and resorts for tourists are established, which will contribute to more job opportunities for locals.

Secondly

, if a place can attract an influx of travellers, the government, as well as businesses sensing chances of profits, will invest funds into it to improve facilities and transportation systems.

This

is beneficial for not only the livelihood of residents but

also

the wealth of a nation. The development of international travel,

on the other hand

, brings several issues associated with the environment. The emissions from vehicles,

such

as planes, cars, and motorbikes, and factories are a key factor leading to air pollution.

Furthermore

, it is believed that the loss of natural ecosystems is the consequence of

tourism

. The reason is that businesses may destroy natural habitats for wildlife to make room for modern infrastructure, posing a great risk to endangered species. Deforestation will

also

indirectly result in the greenhouse effect, which is harmful to human beings. In conclusion, despite some environmental problems, the merits of international

tourism

are undeniable. My view is that governments should implement some policies to preserve the environment while enhancing

tourism

industries.