It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Over the world, there are several ancient buildings available which are very costly to reconstruct and overlook. I completely agree with

this

view and I think the authority should lay out

this

property on developing up to date buildings

instead

of spending bill on primitive buildings. On the one hand, redevelopment and taking care of outdated building is dissipated of payment because those buildings are hazardous for everyone, anytime it may demolish and there is no guarantee for those establishments. A building of Bangladesh is Rana Plaza was a great illustration of

this

, around seven years ago

this

building was destroyed and tens of thousands of people died. Another significant reason is that old buildings have no source of income, those types of establishments are used for exhibitions. As a consequence, government should invest wage on new skyscrapers

instead

of ancient buildings.

On the other hand

, constructing modern skyscrapers means progressing country. When a contemporary building is founded that time, many people may obtain works and people are able to do business in the building. By

this

way people can earn bill and economy of a country will be increased day bay day.

For instance

, prosperous country always tries to develop modern buildings like Buzz Khalifa, which is a biggest skyscraper in the world and the owner of

this

gain big amount of money. For

this

reason I think spending wealth on primitive building is squandered of pay. Bureaucrats should consume

this

capital on fresh buildings. In conclusion,

this

essay explored that outdated construction is dangerous for our lives because it may ravage anytime.

Also

mentioned that modern skyscrapers are w

ork

Suggestion

working

for source of income, and several people can earn payment by working here.In my opinion, Investing property on old buildings means spend like water, for

this

reason I agree with

this

statement.