Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians do. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

Among people in the society, famous people and members of government are more subject to the public. Comparing with politicians,

however

, actors, artists and musicians achieve more economic benefits. There are a number of underlying causes ranging from social popularity to business interests. One of the reasons is that popularity happens when common people follow celebrities. As the more common people follow trends, celebrities step into marketing and they even function as

influencers

a power to affect persons or events especially power based on prestige etc

influences

. As an example, we can refer to Taylor Swift, who is about 10 years raking one of the top ten. She is indeed a singer;

however

, after her

first

album she found more followers on social media. He is now making money through her albums, selling stadium tickets and trading products.

This

a credence that she contracts to companies and more people buy the products that she advertises.

Moreover

, when celebrities function better in an especial field, they can act as influences. My friend who has been diagnosed with having diabetes type 1 since 13 years ago is an

influencer

a power to affect persons or events especially power based on prestige etc

influence

on Instagram. He is famous for his knowledge about herbs and women's problems associated with prolonged high blood sugar.

Also

, he advertises relevant pages and special products. All of these activities can influence people and can leave impacts on their decision making process. Of prominent consequences is that others and she get people to buy or use particular products.

On the other hand

, celebrities and

influencers

enjoy the financial gains achieved by

such

activities. To the best of my knowledge, politicians receive salaries and they usually invest. Politicians in a democracy need to earn enough to be financially independent.

Otherwise

, they would depend on other sources of income during their mandate. Those sources of income would

then

have control over the politician and could exert influence on their decisions. An example is Donald Trump. He follows his ongoing business interests, which have raised concern for some that politics and profits may violate the emoluments clause of the constitution. He has

also

invested

on

Suggestion

in

his branded products and real estate licenses that made Trump remain popular.

Hence

, the other

sources politicians

Accept comma addition

sources, politicians

think of are

manufacturing

Suggestion

manufactured

branded products, investing in banks, building luxurious hotels, restaurants and so forth. To summarize, the way celebrities can make money is so varied and so much affected by

people

Suggestion

the people

that moneymaking is more periodical. While politicians are more concerned with businesses that after years they reap the rewards.

In other words

, building a network is not something politicians can do.

Thus

, either celebrities or politicians get rich, many people are negatively influenced by their marketing

behaviors

manner of acting or controlling yourself

behaviours

.