The government should pay to the parents of very young children , so that one of them can stay at home and look after their children. What do you think are the pros and cons of this policy? Justify your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is known from history, modern sciences, and human experiences of previous generations that one of the young parents should be with their small children and I incline to the financial assistance which can be fruitful in the future as there are many advantages for family for short terms and for society and for the whole country in the long terms. But as usual every program has negative sides and we will discuss in

this

essay cons of the mentioned problem in details too. As was mentioned above, let us consider of the family as the major and important unit of whole society because healthy child gives to parents joy and motivation in the all areas of their lives including business or employed job.

For example

, poor health of the child can make unpleasant disruption in the work schedule and can threat of decreasing income or even lost of income on the micro level and affect the macro- level of the economy. So financial backing for raising small children is very important for developing good health of the youngest citizens at the beginning of their lives.

Furthemore

in addition

Furthermore

,

Accept space

,

I believe that government, particularly in the UK should provide financial help to parents in order provide to the country healthy future generation of the taxpayers who will be able to be efficient in conditions of strong competition. Another example, Danish government established the rule which is giving some sums to parents because only they can give adequate care and love to the children.

Although

on the pros of supportive policy and there are a few cons on

this

matter while

Accept comma addition

matter, while

some people can overuse that advantage in a perverted way. In my neighbourhood, I observed a family with of 6 or 7 children and these people use it as an opportunity to have a parasitic style of life by taking money from the government without giving anything back. By my observation the parents are not working and they follow of the idle stile of life in spite of the fact that their children already grown. And another negative effect of complementary financial funds will be a heavy burden on the shoulders of the taxpayers as monetary funds go from the national budget and replenishment of national treasury can be made through the taxes. In conclusion, I believe that the pros overweight the cons because by supporting the family with financial funds can help to grow healthy and able generation which can be creative and efficient in social and business life of the country.