In
this
knowledge-based society, there is a discussion about the method of selecting students for admission. Given the opinion of some people, the institutional priority may be the ideal average score, but I give my vote for the group that believes that it is not imperative to be based on a good certificate.
On the one hand, for
worth noting that Rather than filling
with well-rounded students, many colleges, particularly selective ones, seek to identify a mix of applicants who show a passion and very deep talent in an area or two, and because of
this
they accept candidates according to the criteria of an excellent average mark.
Although
the quality of a leader will help ensure the effectiveness of learning, ideal students have a higher perception of
.
For instance
, by adhering to the introductory program at the best
university
in the world - Harvard, exclusively professional students are able to study at
this
higher education institution.
Additionally
, No matter how selective the
university
is, student grades will probably matter most.
more precisely
Admissions officers place a high value on
student's academic transcriptSuggestion
the student's academic transcript
a student's academic transcript
as an indicator of how prepared students are for college work.
As a result
, excellent students will ensure the prosperity of the
university
.
On the other hand
, I agree that the election program should give a chance to those who do not have an ideal average score.
Firstly
Admission
counselorssomeone who gives advice about problems
a worthy candidate to be one who looks beyond the bounds of an assessment of evidence of leadership and individual value.
In other words
, it is important for universities
students who will make special programs that will improve the effectiveness of training. Even if academic preparedness talks about college preparedness, responsibility and leadership will push the
university
forward on a rating scale. To illustrate,
At Roanoke College, it receives about 5,500 applications each year and accepts about 72% of the candidates, because it is always looking for the potential and diversity of students.
Secondly
, Institutional priorities could
also
include finding students with exceptional talent in art, music or athletics or filling department-specific needs
Such
a so-called holistic approach to admissions can work to the advantage of those who understand it and present their strengths
accordingly
.
Thus
, due to the life or creative skills of students, it will be more interesting to study at universities.
In conclusion, taking into account the opinion of a group of people, it can be concluded that only those with an excellent certificate should be accepted into universities, but I believe that in real life the selection committee should be based on skills and give chances to everyone.