Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Some people hold that investing

art

is wasting

money

for the government; whereas, the

authority

could spend

money

in other fields.

Although

funding

art

is the best way for developing local culture, I believe that the

money

should be directed in other purposes. Education one of the main aspect in country. The

authority

should spend

money

on education system, which is the most important aspect among young part of society, purchasing new educational tools. Clearly, the

authority

should supply educational institutions with high tech gadgets

such

as computers, digital blackboard and sport equipment. When quality of teaching increases within the country,

for instance

, younger become motivated to gain knowledge.

Furthermore

, if the university furnished with laboratory tools, students can create new substances, participating in practice rooms.

In addition

, graduates can be one of those who governs the country. Indeed, any nationality has a diverse culture. The

authority

should invest the various branches of creative activities,

such

as painting, traditional music: folklore and opera, which preserve local traditions.

For instance

, when residents travel to

art

galleries or museums, they might tend to be visually literate in those places.

However

, the

art

galleries or museums can be invested themselves

with

Suggestion

to

pay which earned from dairy visitors.

Furthermore

, youths should be educated at school or tertiary education places in order to become aware about all subjects

such

as math, physics or just biology. To sum up, while there are

discussion

Suggestion

discussed

discussing

either

art

should be funded or government should pay attention other spheres, I believe that elected officials should invest in public educational institutions.