Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is important to consider that how the buildings of the past should be utilized. Many people contend that restoring them would be heavy on their pockets and it would be better to replace them

by

Suggestion

with

newly constructed buildings.

However

, I partially agree with

this

argument as some

heritage

sites should be reserved for cultural and economic purposes. One of the major

reason

Suggestion

reasons

for demolishing old buildings is that their poor conditions.

Such

buildings can be damaged easily in some natural calamities and fixing it for future use could be a waste of money.

In addition

to

this

,

such

buildings should be monitored by appropriate government authorities so that if someone purchases

such

constructed sites, they should inform them that it needed to be reconstructed.

Furthermore

, the space of these sites can be used for other purposes,

for example

construction of schools, parks, offices or shopping malls which might generate more jobs around the area.

Nevertheless

, some ancient sites have good base structure,

hence

it should be kept for

restroration

the act of restoring something or someone to a satisfactory state

restoration

purposes. As these buildings can be used for the purpose of enhancing tourism by preserving

heritage

way of construction artefacts.

Additionally

, they can be restored into

heritage

hotels and resorts as well. To illustrate

this

, in many countries around the world, they have kept their historic constructions as an

artefacts

Suggestion

artefact

, which generates enormous tourism in their countries. To sum up,

although

restoring all old buildings would definitely be an expensive call; especially if they lack strength in them. In my view, some of them should be restored as a cultural

heritage

of the past to boost economic activities

such

as tourism.