Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, few citizens consider that senior staff has to step out at 54 years of age in order to give chance to the new employee.

This

topic disagrees with an argument and believes 55 is not the right stage to retire from an employment.

Firstly

, it will discuss Senior people efficiency and recruitment.

Secondly employees

Accept comma addition

Secondly, employees

stability and followed by a conclusion. Industries are hiring the dynamic people who are passionate about the change and setting the 55 years of employment to the senior staffs is an inappropriate decision.

Although

,

this

will lead the High

level

crew life which is

furthermore

effected on the employment. For an example, survey studies in U.S, people who retired early has not seen a significant life due to various reasons

such

as debts, different loans to clear

besides

looking after family. An enterprise must understand the importance of being a senior in the

business

which helps the juniors to improve the designed roles and boosts them for the

further

challenging stages.

Nevertheless

, to bring more productivity and development in the young generations, a seniority

level

is required them to learn and brings the enterprise

business

to be more successful.

For instance

, 78% of Young Indians consider that they are inspired and motivated by experienced staffs in an organization. To conclude, companies must boost the senior employees to continue their

duty

Suggestion

duties

with them and young employees must learn from the senior employee to make the

business

successful. In my opinion, top

level

force

business

level

must be extended to be fair and reasonable.