Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

People show contrary arguments with regard to the best way of judging offences. While a group of people accepts that setting a fixed penalty for each type of

crime

would strengthen the governmental justice

system

, I totally agree with others who believe that the circumstances of each

crime

and motives standing behind each felony should be carefully evaluated in order to produce a fair

punishment

. On the

one

hand, there are relevant reasons why many individual persons support the idea of fixed

punishment

for each category of criminal activity.

One

key reason is that

this

sort of justice

system

acts as a deterrent for many criminals, as they would realize that there is a swift and strict sentence for serious offences.

For example

, an international survey has demonstrated that the rate of crimes has been greatly reduced in certain countries after adopting fixed harsh punitive systems for each sort of

crime

. Another point, Fixed

punishment

will probably save not only much time, but

also

an enormous amount of money that could be allocated to other vital public services

such

as health and education

system

.

For instance

, if the circumstance of individual crimes or motivation for committing

such

actions needs to be considered, the government has to spend nation budget for different sections,

such

as payments for lawyers and police security. Despite the above argument, I totally approve with the other group who agree that the fixed

punishment

system

seems to be rather unfair, and

therefore

lawyers should investigate the conditions of individual crimes as well as the motivational factors leading to serious actions. It is possible for two people who committed crimes to have entirely different motives.

For instance

,

one

person has killed someone

as a result

of

self-defence reaction

Suggestion

the self-defence reaction

, while the other

one

has done the same

crime

because to steal an immense amount of money effortless.

Consequently

, it would be biased decision to set

one

strict

punishment

for these two individuals.

Besides

, there are several people who are mentally ill, so when they commit an offence they would be judged

accordingly

,

instead

of being grouped into the same category of all the other type of murders.

Furthermore

, evaluating the whole situation and the factors leading to crimes ensure the existence of the sense of humanity within the justice

system

.

For example

, felons who committed criminal activity in order to get money so as to be able to satisfy their survival basics need, should not be sentenced as those who committed

such

offences in order to gain too much profit. In conclusion, while some people assure that fixed

punishment

could be beneficial for some good reasons, I believe with others its disadvantages far outweigh its benefits.