It is widely accepted the a significant number of museums receive charging fees from
for the purpose of admittance, while others permit free
for sightseers.
essay will discuss that the downsides of
tendturn sharply; change direction abruptly
will not outweigh
and I would argue the possible encouragement of visiting
if the
is free of
the collected revenue of tickets could be spent on maintaining preferable conditions of museums as well as the possibility of being
destruction but
ignorant Suggestion
an ignorant tourist
ignorant tourists
will, indisputably, decrease considerably providing they are forced to make entering payments.
Undeniably, providing free entering to museums will persuade
to attend national ones because
might be an unsolvable issue for certain people and if the cost of
had been eliminated in past decades, museums would have experienced additional visits comparably because being free have, in most cases, encouraged people to visit particular
attractions since they can enjoy the
without the concern of being lack of
for other leisure activities and their basic needs namely food and accommodation fees,
may be persuaded to visit a certain
if they don not have to pay prices. To illustrate in personal aspect, as a
in Turkey I visited several mosques in which staff did not accept any entering
because, simplistically, I did not have any worries of
shortage for my hotel stay,
I enjoyed the visits being mentally comfortable.
, it is noteworthy that
may not, realistically, pay sufficient attention to the precious asserts of a certain nation collected in the
by entering it not being charged for their admission and it may
difficulties for workers who work in
valuable places in terms of conducting preserving process since
might not recognize the value of objects shown in museums any may destruct the
which is irreversible as object could not be created with the same quality since ancient collection could not be made by ancient ancestors again. To demonstrate based on my observations in Turkish mosques, I saw, unfortunately, several cases of ignorance to priceless decorations in them because tourists thought that because they do not pay any fees, they are allowed to do detrimental vandalism. Another consideration is that if governments receive the collected revenue from international
, they can spend on conserving these places and
adding to
attraction in a certain nation along with recruiting local people in national hotspots which creates huge number of employment
beneficial for the economic progress and reducing the rate of unemployment due to the fact that
collected from sightseers is added to national budget and
,
banknotes will be available to be spent on hiring people in national museums and
more technical and advanced way of preserving valuable objects could be offered by governments which is beneficial to hospitality industry as well since more
will be attracted.
In conclusion,
offering free
to museums could encourage additional holidaymakers to make visits in
places, I believe that due to the probable destruction that it cause by not well-informed tourists and the probability of suggesting more modernized methods of conservation of
valuable items and the chance of recruitment from local people to be employed as workers in
attractions, it seems more logical to not allow sightseers to enter museums without being forced to pay
prices.