Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

It is widely accepted the a significant number of museums receive charging fees from
tourist
for the purpose of admittance, while others permit free
entrance
for sightseers.
This
essay will discuss that the downsides of
this
tend
turn sharply; change direction abruptly
trend
will not outweigh
possible benefit
Suggestion
the possible benefit
and I would argue the possible encouragement of visiting
national
Suggestion
the national museum
museum
if the
entrance
is free of
charge but
Accept comma addition
charge, but
the collected revenue of tickets could be spent on maintaining preferable conditions of museums as well as the possibility of being
museum
destruction but
ignorant
Suggestion
an ignorant tourist
ignorant tourists
tourist
will, indisputably, decrease considerably providing they are forced to make entering payments. Undeniably, providing free entering to museums will persuade
further
tourist
to attend national ones because
money
might be an unsolvable issue for certain people and if the cost of
entrance
had been eliminated in past decades, museums would have experienced additional visits comparably because being free have, in most cases, encouraged people to visit particular
tourist
attractions since they can enjoy the
place
without the concern of being lack of
money
for other leisure activities and their basic needs namely food and accommodation fees,
thus
may be persuaded to visit a certain
place
if they don not have to pay prices. To illustrate in personal aspect, as a
tourist
in Turkey I visited several mosques in which staff did not accept any entering
money
because, simplistically, I did not have any worries of
money
shortage for my hotel stay,
therefore
I enjoyed the visits being mentally comfortable.
However
, it is noteworthy that
tourist
may not, realistically, pay sufficient attention to the precious asserts of a certain nation collected in the
museum
by entering it not being charged for their admission and it may
place
difficulties for workers who work in
such
valuable places in terms of conducting preserving process since
tourist
might not recognize the value of objects shown in museums any may destruct the
place
which is irreversible as object could not be created with the same quality since ancient collection could not be made by ancient ancestors again. To demonstrate based on my observations in Turkish mosques, I saw, unfortunately, several cases of ignorance to priceless decorations in them because tourists thought that because they do not pay any fees, they are allowed to do detrimental vandalism. Another consideration is that if governments receive the collected revenue from international
tourist
, they can spend on conserving these places and
also
adding to
tourist
attraction in a certain nation along with recruiting local people in national hotspots which creates huge number of employment
that is
beneficial for the economic progress and reducing the rate of unemployment due to the fact that
money
collected from sightseers is added to national budget and
thus
,
further
banknotes will be available to be spent on hiring people in national museums and
also
more technical and advanced way of preserving valuable objects could be offered by governments which is beneficial to hospitality industry as well since more
tourist
will be attracted. In conclusion,
although
offering free
entrance
to museums could encourage additional holidaymakers to make visits in
described
Suggestion
describing
places, I believe that due to the probable destruction that it cause by not well-informed tourists and the probability of suggesting more modernized methods of conservation of
museum
valuable items and the chance of recruitment from local people to be employed as workers in
such
attractions, it seems more logical to not allow sightseers to enter museums without being forced to pay
entrance
prices.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Admission fee
  • Revenue stream
  • Maintenance
  • Overcrowding
  • Commercialization
  • Cultural heritage
  • Diverse attendance
  • Community ownership
  • Access to culture
  • Visitor experience
  • Exhibit quality
  • Cultural mission
  • Reliance on funding
  • Government subsidies
  • Cultural accessibility
What to do next:
Look at other essays: