Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Some feel that humans should be changed, their bad conditions and try to have a better

life

;

however

, there are others who believe the best way is that accept a hard

situation

,

for example

, lack of enough money and

job

dissatisfaction. Both sides of the argument seem to be worth discussion and I believe that prove or

change

the

situation

depends on the

situation

. Looking for having an ideal

life

without any hardship helps us improve our bad conditions. Trying to

change

difficult situations

such

as a shortage of money or a

job

that we are not happy with, cause to, have blissful

life

and in most cases, these efforts lead to progress. Take some simple employees with a low salary as an example, they should get an extra or part-time

job

for improving their

life

quality and in some cases, they can

change

their

job

. By doing these actions they will probably be more satisfied with their lives.

On the other hand

, it is understandable why many are against changing a bad

situation

. It is not clear how much energy and time needs to improve conditions and will these efforts pay off or is it a risk? So it is obvious some people afraid of

change

.

Also

, if they

change

their

job

, they would start again and there is no guarantee of having a better

situation

in comparison with the previous

job

.

Hence

, they try to adapt themselves with every condition and their contentment leads to having a stress-free

life

. In conclusion, I believe it is not necessary to think about

change

in any bad circumstance. Sometimes we should live in the moment and enjoy our

life

, but there is no denying that promotion is good in some situations, so we should analyse the condition before making a decision.