More houses are needed in many countries to cope with increasing populations. Would it be better to build houses in existing towns and cities or to develop new towns in rural areas.
There are strong arguments to be made in support of creating more houses to satisfy people's demand because of an increase in population. From the standpoint of some people
,
building houses in existing towns or cities is considered to be as fruitful a policy as expected. OthersAccept space
,
,
Accept space
,
however
,
believe the saying that converting towns into modern cities would be a key to housing problems.
There are a number of factors which explain the tendency of people to approve of rising Accept space
,
houses
in citiesSuggestion
house
housing
.
PerhapsAccept space
.
,
the most persuasive reason is that in the modern era of todayAccept space
,
,
an influx of people Accept space
,
have
Suggestion
has
proclivity
to own a living Suggestion
a proclivity
the proclivity
place
in cities which can offer them to lead a comfortable life, by earning money with the help of facilities created in cities.It has been well proven that most of the people from rural areas come to cities with the aim of studying or working ,
having witnessed the opportunities in Accept space
,
this
place
,
they are inclined to seek for a new houseAccept space
,
.
Governments, Accept space
.
therefore
,
should allocate capital disbursements into constructing skyscrapers and high rises in cities on people's demand.Accept space
,
Additionally
,
from the financial perspective, rising living places in cities in attempt to meeting the requirements of a growing number of peopleAccept space
,
,
costs less compared to developing new towns in the countryside.GrantedAccept space
,
,
the constructions of new towns in rural areas require much more Accept space
,
efforts
as well as money and it takes time to attract businesses to set up their work in Suggestion
effort
this
emerged cities,
of courseAccept space
,
,
people have reluctant to leave for Accept space
,
this
type of place
which is not formed as cities already built.It means that towns are the most suitable place
to rise houses so as to handle the problem of an increase in population.
Opponents of such
research argue that it is better to built
Suggestion
build
more living
places in the suburbs of the city for people who are in need of it.The clearest justification is that no sooner do civil servers convert rural areas into globalised towns or citiesSuggestion
more livable
,
Accept space
,
than
people are less likely to leave their subsequently or soon afterward (often used as sentence connectors)
then
place
since the towns newly emerged can provide them studying accompanied by working facilities. As a result
, the matter of growing population
in cities becomes less importantSuggestion
the growing population
.
It is at Accept space
.
this
point that by building new towns ,
governments are able to solve not only the problem of Accept space
,
housing but
Accept comma addition
housing, but
also
the issue related to unemployment and they are able to prevent people to carry out a crime as well,
by creating more job opportunitiesAccept space
,
.
What's moreAccept space
.
,
they can Accept space
,
built
more houses Suggestion
build
such
as high rises in the outskirts rather than cities since in the countyside
rural regions
countryside
,
there is an ample amount of land which allows Accept space
,
government
to create houses to Suggestion
the government
fullfil
the demand of individuals in terms of living put in effect
fulfil
place
.Therefore
,
transforming rural areas into cities turns out to be the answer to the problem of housing.
Considering both points of viewAccept space
,
,
it seems to me that newly constructed towns and cities are proven to be as plausible a solution as thought in order for people to provide Accept space
,
houses
.Suggestion
housing
Submitted by babakulovabutolib on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!