Scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the south pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

Owing to the development of

airplanes

, it is convenient for people travelling around the world, especially in the remote

area

.

This

trend brings benefits for scientists in their

research but

Accept comma addition

research, but

also

pose some threats to environmental exploitation. In my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages if the regulation can enforce adequately. Visiting natural environment places broaden the educational horizon. In order to conduct the studies

such

as climate changing, it is essential to travel to the remote natural

area

such

as the north pole. Researching on local can explore some vital information which is difficult to learn

by

Suggestion

from

books.

This

help scientist to acquire the-

first

-hand knowledge that became a piece of strong evidence in their studies.

Therefore

, travelling to remote environments can enhance educational level.

On the other hand

, visitors sometimes cause an environmental issue in those remote areas. Any improper action

such

as throwing the trash on the ground randomly, the result of

this

would destroy the magnificent view and eventually polluted the

area

. A famous place called Machu Picchu in Peru is a suitable example. The numbers of tourists came to travel without cautious attention to protect the environment, so posed dangerous problems to their habitats.

As a result

, the local government should have installed some law to avoid severe exploitation. In conclusion, travelling to the remote environmental

area

can enhance the knowledge of research while it might destroy the natural scenery. A practical solution to address

this

is that local government should impose the law to restrict the number of visitors in a day.

This

regulation can significantly avoid the places suffering too much stress and still open for educational purpose.