The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The debate weather raising the price of petrol and diesel is the most efficient technique to combat the various environmental issues, as opposed to any other way, has become a matter of discussion for many. I completely disagree with

this

Linking Words

statement, in my opinion, there are numerous options available to stop

this

Linking Words

problem, that are more practical. In

this

Linking Words

essay, I shall analyse and outline relevant examples and arguments to support my view. To start with, one of the main flaws of

this

Linking Words

approach is the fact that increasing the oil prices, could cause significant damage to the world's economy.

This

Linking Words

is due to the fact that

for

Suggestion

in

many countries their primary source of the income is oil production and trading, and if the market demand for the fuel decrease, its supply will

also

Linking Words

plummet, resulting in a collapse of these nations.

For example

Linking Words

, a recent study conducted at the Stanford University, showed that the crude oil businesses make up the 70% of the world's economy.

Furthermore

Linking Words

,

although

Linking Words

, it is true that reducing the amount of the vehicles

cou;ld

requests polite permission

could

prove beneficial for the environment,

however

Linking Words

, there are various other sources that contribute a much larger figure of the pollutants in the atmosphere, and it will be better to concentrate the attention on those.