Some people think governments should spend less money on arts and invest more in education. How far do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

I agree that public budgets for

arts

should be decreased, and more money ought to be spent on education

instead

.

This

is true about the money allocated to music, paintings and other forms of

art

, and governments should invest in the

development

and improvement of schools, teachers and educational resources. Education normally plays a more important role in the

development

of a country than

Correct article usage

the

show examples

arts

.

While

art

has great cultural significance, it seems that learning important sciences and skills effectively contributes more greatly to a nation’s progress.

This

is because the

development

of industries, healthcare and

defense

Change the spelling

defence

show examples

relies mostly on a country’s progress in different fields of science and technology, which in turn requires

skillful

Change the spelling

skilful

show examples

teachers, advanced computers and better-equipped laboratories.

Apart from

this

,

art

is already immensely supported by the private sector in most parts of the world. Many

art

galleries invest in new or professional artists, and a large number of wealthy

art

lovers tend to spend lavishly to buy different forms of

art

like paintings and sculptures on a regular basis. Musicians

also

earn a lot from the sales of their CDs, as well as the online sales of their music and concert tickets.

Therefore

, most artists are not likely to require government financial support. In conclusion, I think governments ought to decrease their financial support for

arts

and increase education budgets to improve their countries’

development

.

This

will probably not affect

arts

and artists much since they will still have their supporters in the private sector.