Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, it is said that giving

money

to poorer countries by richer countries is not

a

Suggestion

an

efficient method to deal with

poverty

. Many developed countries should

support

developing countries or poor countries by various ways rather than just giving them

money

. In my opinion, I completely agree with

this

view, and

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

will discuss it in

this

essay.

First

of all, developed countries can spend

money

on other helpful aims. To clarify, they can use that

money

to build a company,

a

Suggestion

an

office or a work place in poorer countries to help poor people get a constant job. By doing

this

, their living quality can be improved and they can make

money

on their own. If richer countries just

support

the other ones by financial aid, there is no effect in preventing people from

poverty

because they just can spend that amount of

money

to live without thinking to have more

money

for a long time.

Secondly

, developed countries can

support

developing countries or even countries still in

poverty

by many ways. They can transfer their goods or food to poorer areas to decrease the number of hungers.

Moreover

, they can establish organizations to provide modern equipment

,

Accept space

,

facilities and services or even building infrastructure to improve the

poverty

in other countries.

For instance

, many countries supported poorer area by building hospitals and schools to help them. In conclusion, I believe that there are still many ways to tackle

poverty

in many poorer countries due to the fact that richer countries depend on the conditions they can

support

.