Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation, companies should encourage high-level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree?

Some individuals think that companies have to make senior employees, who are more than 55, retired to make occupation for youngsters. I disagree with

this

point of view. These days, unemployment is a major issue in lots of countries. By retiring older staff, there will be more vacancies for the

next

generation and we can address

this

issue.

Moreover

, young people are more updated with the latest gadgets and software,

therefore

, it can increase efficiency and productivity through their innovations and creativity.

Also

, by rejuvenating, companies can make a dynamic, active, and competitive atmosphere at the workplace.

On the other hand

, leaving seniors might have some adverse impacts on societies.

Firstly

, when the older workforce becomes retired, societies will become out of very accomplished employees and it can cause some difficulties,

such

as reducing the quality of their professions.

In other words

, people over 55, are usually competent staffs and they have consisted of companies skilled workforces who are highly accomplished in their occupations. So their retirement can cause severe problems and immense repercussions on companies' outcomes.

Secondly

, setting a retirement age at

this

level would have prohibitive costs for insurance companies and governments due to the increasing number of retirees. And

that is

why no country set

this

age for retirement.

Finally

, fifty-five is not too old for leaving work. People at

this

age are still capable, productive, and competent.

Furthermore

, there are too young to be retired, and unemployment might give them a feeling of discriminating and disappointing. In conclusion, rejuvenating can increase efficiency and productivity

besides

reducing unemployment as today's major problem, but I reaffirm my position that I am against

this

view.