In many countries, traditional food is replaced by international fast food. This has adverse effect families, individuals and society. Do you agree or disagree?

It is comprehensively acknowledged that the availability of international foods has risen

significantly which

Accept comma addition

significantly, which

causes many more people do not consume traditional foods. I firmly disagree because

this

is detrimental both for individuals who consume it and society in general. There are two primary reasons to support

this

.

First

and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that consuming fast foods to excess results in serious health problems. Fast foods

such

as fried chickens, hamburgers, and chips- which incredibly high in salt and fat are responsible for

such

ailments as high blood pressure, high level of cholesterol, obesity even heart disease.

Further

and more importantly, some international

foods

Suggestion

food

chain

deliberately attempt

Suggestion

deliberately attempts

to attract children to shape their eating habits. One

particularly

Suggestion

particular

example of

this

is the character of Ronald McDonalds. The bright clothes and smiles are clearly designed to attract kids who push their parents to take them to McDonald's restaurants. Having grown up eating in the restaurants, people are more likely to continue eating there throughout their adult lives. Another frequent criticism of consuming convenience foods is decreasing the value of local foods. Every region has its specific food

specialty

Suggestion

Specialty

. With the introduction of international foods and fast foods, they are more likely to disappear. In

this

way, the local communities will face

unfavorable

not encouraging or approving or pleasing

unfavourable

impacts in terms of losing their traditional value. By way of conclusion, even though fast foods are preferable due to their relatively low cost and convenience, I once again reaffirm that they are deleterious for people’s lives.

In other words

, they are beneficial in the short term, but the dangerous effects are predominant in later life.