Nowadays longer distances are travelled by people to work and study on a daily basis. Some consider it to be a negative development, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent years, travelling between cities on a daily basis has become mandatory for many people. Some argued that the drawbacks of commuting far distances outweigh the benefits, whilst others not.
Although
I personally opine that, there are more negative features, in the following essay I would content to discuss both sides and give my own reasons.
To begin
with, living in city areas is more expensive than urban ones.
That is
to say, dwelling in downtown are extremely imposed huge side fees. Expenses like apartment rental costs, meals, and car parking irrespective of incomes are the prime issue;
However
, city dwellers often choose cities to spend more time with their loved ones and endeavour to study simultaneously. To put it
in other words
, living in towns not only is beneficial in order for spiritual reasons, but it
also
does have fewer expenses for public transportation
such
as subways. In
otherwise
some commuters rather the countryside to attain a delightful scenery and prefer houses for their family.
Moreover
, commuting on a daily basis is highly likely to be a risk.
That is
to say, people travelling a long distance to arrive at work and vice versa are subject to jeopardize human well-being. To make it clear utilizing the transport system, irrespective of the public transportation systems or personal cars is a prerequisite for employees and students for commuting to their destination. Driving on highways, sometimes leads to possible accidents and put people at risk.
In addition
, public transportation has some feasible drawbacks
such
as trains using in Sweden are bound to be a delay or technical problem in winters.
Hence
, living in the countryside would have some feasible advantages and disadvantages. By way of conclusion,
although
travelling more hours to arrive at work or universities has intrinsic value, I once again reaffirm my perspective that the drawbacks of commuting long distances far outweigh the benefits.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: