Some people say that Government should break down all the historic building and replace them with modern buildings. Do you agree or disagree?

Some contemporary style lovers debate about tearing down the old heritage monuments versus the people who support preserving the old structures. My opinion coincides with the latter community, because protecting the aboriginals strengthen the roots of the nation and promote tourism as well. In the current epoch, only 5% infrastructure is centuries old, that provide the sense of belongingness and depict the history of the ancestors. These monuments illustrate the whole picture of a nation from past to present like its destitution, struggle, good or bad times and much more. In India,

for example

, Jaliyan Wala Bagh still has the footprints of the bullets, which remind the nation of the massacre during the independence struggle even after 100 years. Needless to say, it instills the young generation with motivation, that they should not let go the sacrifice of their forefathers in vain and strive hard to make society better. Heritage attracts a lot of travellers from all around the world. Tourists who are interested in the history and love to explore new places or have an affinity towards the antiques often visit these places. Take the Tajmahal, one of the seven wonders of the world, as a case study. People from different parts of the world visit India to see its beauty.

Besides

, their visit to

such

places can not only contribute to earning chances for the locals, but

also

improve the foreign reserve of the government.

Hence

, these historic buildings promote tourism and

also

, contribute to the economy. In conclusion, demolishing the historic structure and transforming them into the latest fashion has been argued for long. I, firmly oppose the destroying of the ancient structures, as it not only intact the connection with ancestors, but

also

assist localities in earning their livings.