Some people think that governments must insist on preserving traditional appearance of old buildings undergoing renovation or redevelopment. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

The old building always reflects typically own local civilization, tradition, and so on. These historical buildings, whether the responsible regime carefully protects to reasonably use public funds or precious fund will properly allocate other possible ways. I agree remarkably with
this
factual statement. I intend to discuss in the following why the authority should take care of ancient buildings.
To begin
with, traditional buildings have historical values that typically indicate a society's cultural identity. Without properly protecting old buildings, it is hard to carefully secure own community tradition and civilization. Even, young people gain knowledge of ancestry building how their noble ancestor willingly sacrificed their precious life to positively establish a well cultured society for them.
Besides
, if the regime would properly protect old buildings,
then
the tourists will lure that buildings and authority would naturally generate funds from those tourists.
Additionally
, many countries have built new buildings and carefully restored old buildings due to wisely keeping, maintaining an impressive combination of old and new which are allured tourists.
However
, people who adamantly oppose
this
statement are thinking that restoring old buildings is a waste of taxpayer money.
For example
, many underdeveloped countries have not adequate funds to allocate the repair of historic buildings because they have other priority sectors
such
as health, education, and so on.
Furthermore
, the population of many countries has increased alarmingly but space to live has decreased so that a traditional building will be replaced to construct modern buildings. To sum up, the conventional building has traditional values so that the regime should properly take care of them
otherwise
it will demolish society's civilization.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users