In some countries, criminal trials are shown on television for the public. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Some countries provide people with access to the details of lawsuits via television or the internet. In my opinion, there is more negative impact to the public by doing

this

and to make better use of

this

information, only important and useful facts should be presented to public. There are more disadvantages by telecasting criminal trials to the public.

Firstly

, many people, especially children struggles psychologically when they hear about crimes.

In other words

, knowing about crimes and watching criminal prosecutions interferes with people thought process and disturbs them mentally. Some individuals may

also

want to commit similar crime or hurt people around them, while others many feel terrifying and have nervous breakdown which impacts their physical health.

On the other hand

, telecasting crimes may bring awareness to people about the society and caution them to be more careful.

For example

, knowing about a kidnap case or theft in their area can alert people and inform them on what preventive measures can be taken to avoid similar situations.

In addition

, some of the actions taken in criminal trials may help people to learn about

law

Suggestion

the law

, how it works, and information presented will help educate them about medicine which can be utilized in a positive way.

However

, the government can just share main facts of what is useful to the society

instead

of presenting the complete trial. In conclusion, telecasting criminal prosecutions does more harm to the public by interfering with lives and to make better use of the crime information, only important facts that help public should be shared

instead

of complete trials.