The enhancement of
efense (military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
spending has increasingly seen as a trending topic to be debated currently, Many people believe that the authority should compute the preservation of its society by increasing its military budget. Actually,
type of thought has been existing since the mid of the 20th
,
idea called as “Military Keynesianism”, which is a perception that believes if the government should improve its military quantity to secure the nation from any outside threat, It means the regime needs to prioritize the
efense (military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
sector
of the social benefits of the civilians.
, the writer of
essay strongly opposes the idea of “Military Keynesianism” to be implemented in the 21st
because the shifting behaviour of states that will be discussed
.
essay aims to provide a clear argument on why the authority should compute social benefits more than the
efense (military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
sector, and
provide rebuttal on why the approach of “Military Keynesianism” is not relevant anymore in
current situation.
By prioritizing the social preservation and utilizing the allocation to fund a social security programs,
as education, health care, aid for unfortunate peoples, unemployment, housing, and environmental protection. It absolutely will boost the development of a state, the unfortunate people could be able to attend school, afford health care, and get a job.
, social spending will
lead to improve the productivity and capacity of its citizen, it eventually will make more people get a job, the more human resources will be improved, the number of illiterate will decreases, and many more. To conclude, if the fertility and quantity of its resident improved, it obviously will enhance its state’s income as well for the
term, and if the government utilizes the budget to fund social guarantee programs, it will become more sustainable compared to
efense (military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
programs.
The concept of “Military Keynesianism is not relevant anymore in
current condition,
concept was very popular back in the 1900s, the main reason why it was popular in 100 years ago, might be because in the past, there had been many armed conflicts that happened, and it eventually made people believe in the concept of Military Keynesianism.
, in the 21st
, there was already many multilateral agreement designed to uphold peace and human rights in which restricted war crimes, there is
the International Humanitarian Law, which strictly regulates about the conduct of armed conflict, and its legally binding for every sovereign state in the world because it derives from Customary Law, which is a general principles accepted by the international community. Due to many legal instruments on human rights and armed conflicts, in
current condition, war rarely happens. Thereupon, it is useless for a
to spend much on
efense (military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
if it is not relevant in
current condition, It is better to spend on social benefits that could enhance the productivity of a nation.
In Conclusion, the world has shifted, and in
modern era, there are many multilateral agreements that bind countries and limit the state behaviour to threaten another nation,
why in the 21st
, war is not likely happening,
it is useless to some extent if a
has over budget on
efense (military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
sector. The rule should compute the social insurance of its inhabitant
and solve social problems. It is because if the needs of the people of a
already fulfilled, it will eventually make them become more productive, and it improves its quantity. The enhancement of capacity of civilians will obviously lead to strengthening the economy of a
. After the economy has increased and the social insurance of the citizen has fulfilled, the government could consider increasing its allocation on
efense (military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies
to ensure its preservation.