It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

It is considered that the

government

is paying out a lot of

money

in order to defend fauna,

however

, it is significant to solve other problems. I completely disagree with

this

opinion and think that the

government

should provide

money

for keeping safe endangered species and animals.

First

of all, I believe that conserving fauna and flora encourages ecological stability and balance in the world. It is essential that the plants play an important role in ensuring a healthy ecosystem by balancing carbon dioxide and oxygen in the environment. Even if the

government

fails to protect

wildlife

and natural habitats can cause many problems.

For example

, it would lead to the destruction of water and causing droughts and destruction.

Although

, uncontrolled human activities like deforestation and logging contribute to negative effects on the environment. That’s why it’s more crucial to defending

wildlife

that brings numerous benefits for both animals and humans.

Second

, the

government

can increase education and learning due to protecting

wildlife

.

In other words

, studying fauna and flora has a great influence on getting knowledge and learning experience.

For example

, taking children to the zoo and game parks is part of the education system. While watching animals help children to develop their imagination and

also

important for their growth.

Thus

, learning

wildlife

that entertains and encourages children in an active life. In conclusion, I strongly believe that governments pay a lot of

money

to protect

wildlife

more beneficial than spending

money

on other problems. Because

wildlife

plays a significant role in human life.