The issue of public
health
has sparked considerable debate in recent times.
While
some
people
argue that
individuals
are accountable for managing their own
health
and dietary choices, others maintain that community
health
should be in charge by the political leadership. In my opinion, I totally agree with the former perspective.
This
essay will explore both sides of the argument before reaching a conclusion.
On the one hand, there are some arguments in favour of the idea that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy
diet
.
To begin
with, governments can ensure everyone has access to healthy
food
options, especially in disadvantaged areas. With the nutritionist, the political leadership can easily build several healthy diets suitable for specific ages and provide
food
to low-income families and
individuals
.
Furthermore
, governments
also
can control
food
quality,
labelingChange the spelling
show examples
, and advertising.
People
do not need to be worried about
food
safety when the
government
sets a standard in
food
production, processing, and storage to minimize contamination.
For instance
, the United States is a prime example of a country with extensive
government
regulations in the
food
industry with a complex system with varying levels of control.
On the other hand
, there are several reasons to support the statement that it is the responsibility of
individuals
to take care of their own
health
and
diet
.
Initially
,
people
have the right to choose their lifestyle and dietary habits. Each person can decide what to consume based on specific dietary restrictions
due to
religious, cultural, or
health
reasons,
such
as halal, kosher, gluten-free, or lactose-intolerant diets.
Similarly
, some
people
choose to follow a vegetarian
diet
so they can not eat meat
due to
government
requirements. Another reason would be that
individuals
can manage their healthcare expenses more efficiently. The cost of an equal
diet
for every citizen might be higher than the extent that the
government
can control so based on the amount of salaries each person made, they can decide the suitable
diet
for them.
For example
, someone with a monthly income of $10,000 has more flexibility in their
food
choices compared to someone who only makes $1,000.
All in all, the facts mentioned above have created a dilemma when
people
evaluate the effects of
this
issue, and it has still sparked controversy in recent years. As far as I am concerned, I put more emphasis on the idea that
health
and dietary choices can be decided by
individuals
instead
of political leadership.
People
should have
further
consideration on
this
issue.