The issue of public
has sparked considerable debate in recent times.
some
argue that
are accountable for managing their own
and dietary choices, others maintain that community
should be in charge by the political leadership. In my opinion, I totally agree with the former perspective.
essay will explore both sides of the argument before reaching a conclusion.
On the one hand, there are some arguments in favour of the idea that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy
.
with, governments can ensure everyone has access to healthy
options, especially in disadvantaged areas. With the nutritionist, the political leadership can easily build several healthy diets suitable for specific ages and provide
to low-income families and
.
, governments
can control
quality,
labelingChange the spelling
show examples
, and advertising.
do not need to be worried about
safety when the
sets a standard in
production, processing, and storage to minimize contamination.
, the United States is a prime example of a country with extensive
regulations in the
industry with a complex system with varying levels of control.
, there are several reasons to support the statement that it is the responsibility of
to take care of their own
and
.
,
have the right to choose their lifestyle and dietary habits. Each person can decide what to consume based on specific dietary restrictions
religious, cultural, or
reasons,
as halal, kosher, gluten-free, or lactose-intolerant diets.
, some
choose to follow a vegetarian
so they can not eat meat
requirements. Another reason would be that
can manage their healthcare expenses more efficiently. The cost of an equal
for every citizen might be higher than the extent that the
can control so based on the amount of salaries each person made, they can decide the suitable
for them.
, someone with a monthly income of $10,000 has more flexibility in their
choices compared to someone who only makes $1,000.
All in all, the facts mentioned above have created a dilemma when
evaluate the effects of
issue, and it has still sparked controversy in recent years. As far as I am concerned, I put more emphasis on the idea that
and dietary choices can be decided by
of political leadership.
should have
consideration on
issue.