Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt simple lifestyle to solve the problem while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People ask why we should change our behaviour while the expert can work to improve = technological devices to become more friendly for an atmosphere. It said needlessly that the people have two views toward that who should carry a response about the contaminated environment. Some of them claim that people are responding so they have to change their conduct to combat the contaminated particular which human being activations emission into an air. Other, refusing

this

vision, believe that

this

view is not impractical, so the expert should improve the technological devices.

Firstly

, it seems clear that human activations participate in deplete the layer ozone, so we should regular it.

Firstly

, a lot of factories produce the chemical contaminated material classified as harmful for the environment. For

this

reason, if we dwindled these materials, we would increase a quality of the air.

Secondly

, other campuses argue that

this

vision is not a practical idea for several reasons. The major reason is that reduction of processes, factories leads to terminating a lot of employees’ contract.

However

, it may result in deficit of production in the market.

however

Suggestion

However

,

this

campus believe we should encourage research to make the technology more friendly for the environment.

Firstly

, it said truly that the car is a major source of the greenhouse. For

this

reason, when the scientific development, environmental engine, participate in a reduce the green houses. In conclusion, it's clear that people think about various solutions for the pollution leading them to become in two groups.

First

group appeals people to change their usage of technological item, other support scientist to improve these items in order to reduce the air pollution.