Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In general, most people tend to
view
things differently, even whether how the old buildings in cities or neighbourhood shall be dealt with. For some people, they may think that demolition and reconstruction would be the best method to do so.
However
, in my opinion, I disagree that
such
claim would end with an effective way to get rid of ancient buildings, as the budget for
that is
not flexible and it is
also
difficult to deal with, in terms of
time
and forces. The following cases and examples will help support my point of
view
.
Initially
, the way to use one’s money for houses or accommodation refurbishment can be changed.
For example
, the minimal person would eventually spend lesser on the accessories.
On the other hand
, the cost of many materials for construction is not so elastic, as the cheaper the material is, the lower its quality, and eventually the constructed work may be worse than an original one.
This
would visualise that the amount of money for restoration can be adapted to the taste of the owner and the current formation of the house.
Moreover
, the destroy-and-rebuild method is not a piece of cake. In order to do so, the engineer and the construction site workers will be employed by the house owner. The process would take a long period of
time
to be finished, depending on how big or complex the site is.
On the other hand
, the restoration can be done in a few hours with a substantially smaller group of people. The bigger the employee group, the faster and better the final work will be.
Thus
, the restoring process spends less labour and
time
than the other means. In conclusion, it is hard to make all people tend to
view
things in a similar direction, even in the case of how to deal with ancient building. Some may agree that it should be demolished and new ones should be built
instead
.
Nevertheless
, I still disagree that
such
means would be as effective as expected, as more cost, labour, and
time
would be used to accomplish. The examples and case mentioned above have supported my point of
view
to the best.
Submitted by s.juntarawatt on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: