Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The nature of

work

done by people has become a debatable topic. Many intellectuals reckon that a person is likely to carry out same

work

rather that any variation in it. While, others are considering the diversity in the pattern of

work

is lucrative for workers.

This

essay will discuss both views, along with my opinion.

To begin

with, the former view is emphasizing the effectiveness of a

worker

in a repetitive

work

. An individual can hold a good command of a task with optimum productivity, with the help of experience in that

work

. If the nature of the

work

will fluctuate continuously; a person cannot cop the difficulties in its operation.

For instance

, the

worker

in the production having vast experience can efficiently and accurately complete

this

task due to his past experiences.

Moreover

, the variety of

work

brings excessive stress to the

worker

.

As a result

, he would try to avoid

such

things.

On the other hand

, the latter view is portraying the potential of an individual with challenging different patterns of

work

. Many workers want to break the monotony of the

work

and try to attempt different way to

work

.

Such

flexibility in the workplace will enhance the skill of a

worker

, as well as might result in the innovative style of

work

.

For example

, the modern companies are encouraging their staffs to adopt the flexible

work

over the period of time for their holistic development.

Thus

, the discriminatory nature of

work

will be fruitful for the people. In conclusion, the ultimate goal of the workers is to accomplish the

work

in an effective manner. In my opinion, the latter view is more dynamic to fulfil the need of the workers and employers.

Such

optimistic way of

work

Suggestion

working

can enlarge the range of capability of a

worker

.