Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is widely argued that watching live events will be more appealing than those broadcasted on

TV

. In my opinion, I agree with the idea that it is more interesting and exciting to go to these events than a similar version on

TV

. On the one hand, there are many reasons why people prefer to live performance.

Firstly

, the atmosphere in the stadium evokes the excitement and amusement that attendees cannot find

this

feeling if watching at home.

For example

, attending a music concert not only watches the idol’s

performance but

Accept comma addition

performance, but

also

a part of the cheering team to warm the environment.

Moreover

, it is a chance to get out and meet individuals with mutual interests. By sharing the same interest, we can easily strike up a conversation with a

stranger person

Suggestion

stranger in person

.

On the other hand

, lots of people prefer to broadcasted live performances on

TV

. The

first

reason is that keep up with a concert through a screen is more economical and time-saving.

Instead

of joining the crowd and having a long wait in the queue, we can chill at home by just turning on the television.

Also

, those watching broadcasted performances are likely to see some parts of the show more clearly due to the movement of cameramen. If the seat is far from the stage, attendees can negatively affect to see the whole show. In conclusion, opting for a live performance or a broadcast program on

TV

is an

individuals’

Suggestion

individual

individual’s

choice. For me, I am delighted to be a part of the cheering crowd in a live show.