A growing number of people feel that animals should be not exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as human, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reason from your own experience and examples where relevant

All living beings, including animals are part of the nature. A large population believes that animals should not be utilized by humans while others assert that they play an important role in food and research. I hold the view that animals should not be employed by people for their own benefit. The animal exploitation proponents claim that animals play an important role in research activities. Researchers use animals in laboratories for clinical trials so that new medicines can be invented and tested before they are launched in the market for curing of diseases.
For example
Linking Words
, rats are used by the Pitt Hopkins Research Foundation in US to study the effects of new drugs in the treatment of genetic disorders in children.
In addition
Linking Words
, animals are the main source of food in western countries. They affirm that population of some animals like chicken, goats, beef etc., will increase at a massive rate if they do not eat them.
Thus
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
helps them in balancing the cycle of nature.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, opponents contend that every living being has the right to live. They make arguments that utilising animals are in fact an animal abuse, which involves torturing or killing them.
For instance
Linking Words
, some famous restaurants use chemicals and other painful measures to raise chicken for producing meat.
Moreover
Linking Words
, using animals for food is more of a choice rather than an urgent need. Many other
alterantive
one of a number of things from which only one can be chosen
alternative
foods are
also
Linking Words
available which are rich in proteins and other nutrients like beans, legumes, leafy vegetables etc. To sum up, while there are many convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, I would argue that exploiting animals by humans in unnecessary and should be banned.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: