Some people think that parents should be punished if their children commit crimes because they are responsible for their children's actions To what extent do you agree or disagree

The rate of juvenile delinquency has been progressively increasing over the past few years, so the responsible bodies are searching for ways to curb it. Some individuals claim that the parents of law-breaking youngsters should face some sort of punishment

This

essay will argue why I completely agree with

this

statement despite the admitted innocence of (55)

To begin

with, arguing for punishing innocent parents over the actions of their offspring seems a bit preposterous Indeed, parents almost never participate in violating the law with their they kindle law-abusing demeanour in any way.

Moreover

, the blame would be misplaced if parents were punished while the a crime thanks to bad-tempered friends.

For example

, many school boys are turning into vandalism or engaging in fights with their peers because of their friends' ill advice. All these mean that punishing parents for something they did not do is ridiculous. (92)

Nevertheless

, actually punishing parents and displaying it to their kids may lead to in youth crime. Naturally, children, no matter how are, they do not want to see their parents get fined or punished because of their wrong steps. Unusually,

this

system is prevailing throughout many countries. Namely, in British schools, after the

first

warning made to parents to work on correcting their kid's the school authorities legitimately fine them or even can go up to sentencing them for a while.

This

may be the clear reason for why youngsters' offence has become envyingly rare in

such

nations. (103) In conclusion, it is undeniable that parents are seen as responsible for the nature of their offspring.

Although

at

first

sight, punishing parents

instead

of youth may seem non-sense, oppositely it may turn out to be the exact pathway towards reducing youth crime steeply. (42) Word: 292