People believe that being literate in English allows you to acquire better jobs and thus allows one to have access to a better standard of living. Up to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Although

, English is a widely accepted

language

for communication worldwide it would be unfair to say that having a proficiency in the

language

is the most important factor in securing an employment to have

one

's existence. I differ to acknowledge that education in English is the only way to have a better standard of living.

This

essay will discuss in detail my opinion difference. Apparently, to improve the standard of living

one

should be literate to have his livelihood, but the knowledge can be gained in any

language

not mandatory in English. To continue, some folks have much advance the standard of living in comparison to the community which is proficient in English speaking. To have an ideal living

one

should be expertise in his core skills.

For example

, Farmers, Goldsmith, artists would not be recognized by society if they lack expertise in their respective fields, even though they a sound knowledge of the

language

.

Furthermore

, There are many countries in the world where English is not the

first

language

of communication, yet have a better standard of living.

This

proves that skill and knowledge of the field is the important factor to have a successful career and to enhance

one

's livelihood.

For example

, In countries like France, Spain and Canada prefer the candidates who are familiar with the local

language

over the English speaking candidates. To conclude, hard work, dedication, recognition and understanding of the trade are important aspects of a person to have an excellent professional life which elevates the way of life.