Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Health

fund has always played an imperative role in the national budget since the early stages of the world due to people’ demands which are relevant to their well-being’s concerns.

Thus

, it is admitted that officials should spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle with the view to consider prevention as a top priority. While I agree with

this

point of view, I would contend that spending money on medication for people who are already suffering from disease should not be ignored. On the one hand, there is a common belief that there are some clear merits of allocating state budget on the promotion of healthy lifestyles. The most obvious benefit is that citizens could ensure their

health

sustainable due to the government’s fitness awareness campaigns which advocate prevention than cure. The proclivity of raising dwellers’ self-awareness about bettering their lifestyle could significantly encourage them to follow healthy eating habits and exercises religiously,

thus

, the increasing number of people with stable strength conditions may lead to the reduced reliance on medical therapy.

In addition

, if individuals are able to be aware of the importance of taking care of themselves, the national budget investing in social healthcare may be cut down.

Therefore

,

this

public money can be utilized to supply other fields

such

as education or environment, which would benefit society comprehensively.

On the other hand

, investing in

social medical

Accept comma addition

social, medical

remedy for the purpose of taking care of sick patients is

also

vital for some notable reasons. The

first

reason is that citizens have paid taxes for the government,

therefore

, the public

health

services which are paid by residents’ personal energy insurance should be funded by the state.

Moreover

, the central authorities should offer a privilege of free medical treatment for those living in poverty who cannot afford the increased cost of medical fees.

Additionally

, the government must take prompt actions in an attempt to cope with the unexpected outbreak of epidemic at any time.

For instance

, the outbreak of life-threatening disease called NCOV-19 recently has put Vietnamese

health

at risk and luckily, the top leaders have deliberated and brought out outstanding measures which is ascribed to the reserve of the national

health

funds to significantly control the number of patients in a particular period of time. In brief, while I agree that preventive method should be the top priority, I opine the regimen of sick patients should not be undervalued.