Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is sometimes argued that foreigners pay higher fees for cultural and historical attractions than natives. Personally, I completely disagree with

this

statement for a variety of reasons. From the perspective of foreign visitors, it is totally unreasonable for them to pay more for cultural and historical attractions.

First

of all, foreigners have every right to be treated equally as natives.

Otherwise

, it would deter foreigners from visiting

such

attractions, and

consequently

, not only hinder the social intercourse between

countries but

Accept comma addition

countries, but

also

block the spread of local

culture

,

thus

making the country isolated from all the other countries throughout the world. Apart from

this

, the decrease of foreign visitors could cause the decline of visitors overall, and

therefore result

Suggestion

therefore results

in a drop in the total income from tourism. From the perspective of native visitors,

this

policy appears to be of their interest.

However

,

this

could,

by contrast

,

also

have some negative effects on them. The cheaper price of local cultural and historical attractions may make them feel that their own

culture

is

cheap

Suggestion

cheaper

and less-advanced than those overseas and

thus

lose their self-confidence of the domestic

culture

and nation as well as treat foreign

culture

as something superior. Apart from

this

,

natives

Suggestion

the natives

might have less motivation to visit natural attractions and foreign sites when comparing the prices and

thus

keeping them away from nature and foreign sites. In conclusion, it is, in my opinion, thoroughly wrong to give preference to local visitors and inferiority to foreign visitors when it comes to the fees of cultural and historical attractions.