Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today, because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer. Do you agree or disagree

It is true that advances in technology give most people a chance to see historical objects and works of art on a computer screen. While nobody can deny the fact that with a lot of the technological breakthrough in recent years, it enables people to see face-to-face their favourite objects or sculptures in the virtual world,
however
, I just party agrees with the view that museums and art galleries are no longer necessary On the one hand, there are two main reasons why some individuals nowadays are deciding against seeing the relics or statues in the art exhibitions or museums. One reason is that it is very expensive in order to have a slight glimpse of these historical things because the entrance fee is tremendously exorbitant as the head of these places want to maximize their profits. Apart from that with the outbreak of many pandemics like the Coronavirus that leads to a growing number of unemployment workers or the production processes may result in serious environmental degradation so governments always prioritize their spending on some health public services and install a lot of waste treatment system to control these consequences so that leaves these museums and galleries become obsolete. Another reason is that in many countries, the national authorities tend to opt for a mixed funding model for the arts in order to reduce costs as much as possible. Following
this
, I believe that it is an unaffordable luxury to retain these wonderful public collections.
As a result
, these artefacts and paintings can be accessed freely and almost instantly by the touch of a key on a computer keyboard.
On the other hand
, apart from the practical disadvantages mentioned/expressed above, I would argue that it could be sad if people witness the disappearance of these places.
Firstly
, the buildings which house the collections are the part of our tangible cultural heritage in
this
civilized world.
For example
, the National gallery in VN is a striking historical building which becomes an internationally well-known tourist destination across the globe.
Furthermore
, the feeling of awe on seeing the size of the great dinosaur skeletons in place
such
as the New York museum would be impossible to experience by just simply looking through an image on a laptop or cell phone. If will be an immense loss if
such
places are strictly forced to shut down in front of the public. In conclusion, it seems to me that
although
these culture facilities have the unique aesthetic qualities.
However people
Accept comma addition
However, people
can easily access to their treasures thanks to the digital revolution which establish a closer link within the host community
Submitted by toàn khánh on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • virtual
  • digital
  • online
  • accessibility
  • inclusivity
  • cultural heritage
  • physical experience
  • immersion
  • local tourism
  • economy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: