Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is commonly believed that the repair of buildings constructed too many years ago demands a high expenditure because of

this

issue, those buildings have to be removed and replaced with new ones. I partially agree with the statement that demolishing old houses might be a reasonable alternative.

First

and foremost, over the

last

few years, the majority of countries have confronted with financial predicaments. The focal reason why those states are suffering from a shortage of sufficient money is the unprofessional regulation of the economy. More specifically, even though they cannot benefit from those old buildings, they solely want to protect edifices. To put in another word, old buildings

are repaired

Suggestion

is repaired

frequently to eschew considerable destructions,

thus

, the state loses a large amount of capital which in turn might result in pernicious repercussions

such

as economic collapse.

On the other hand

, every country has a peculiar history and they ought to conserve their cultural inheritance from falling oblivion. To be more specific, those old historical buildings are crucial attributes of their culture.

Furthermore

, some countries flourished in the tourism section secure a high gain as tourists from overseas countries visit old intriguing constructions.

That is

to say, the Italy government takes crucial steps to preserve Pizza towel from ruin because

that is

both their heritage and popular tourist attraction. By way of conclusion, despite

repairment

the act of returning money received previously

repayment

of old buildings have abominable impacts on the state economy, there are

also

beneficial consequences. I would say, the authorities should take into consideration all significant factors and should tackle

this

controversial problem.