Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.

Economically stable nations usually assist poorer nations with financial support, whereas
doesn’t solve the primary issue “the poverty”.
, other means of backing should be given to the poor countries rather than financial support. I completely agree with
context, as money can only help the country for short term, whereas other fundamental amenities should be established to bring them out of poverty.
To begin
with, money is a highly influential factor which decides the growth and socioeconomic status of the people and the country. In spite of being an important factor, it is not enough to judge a countries growth and development. Infrastructure, health care facility, education, transportation, employment status, human developmental index
plays key role in deciding countries status. If poor countries were only given financial backing, it might not serve its primary purpose if it ends up in the hands of bad politicians or not properly utilized by them.
, basic needs should be made available for all, to ensure that rich countries should help poor countries by supporting them in creating new law, plans for better education, sanitation and job opportunity.
For instance
, after world war 2 people of japan and south Korea were severely affected and devastated by the consequences of the war. United states of America were the superpower of that time, it provided both financial and moral backing to these countries and provided enough opportunity for their development. In recent times, China is doing the same to many under-developed Asians and African countries. To conclude, I would argue that money alone can’t decide the well being of any country. Developed countries came forward to provide financial aid, but it might not be enough,
, support should be wholesome to guarantee the best possible outcome of the developing countries.
Submitted by le thong on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Topic Vocabulary:
  • poverty alleviation
  • economic inequality
  • developing nations
  • foreign aid
  • sustainable growth
  • technical assistance
  • expertise
  • infrastructure
  • education
  • fair trade
  • trade barriers
  • sustainable development
  • environmental conservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: