The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?

Due to the increase of tourism, English is now the

first

Linking Words

and the principal

language

Use synonyms

in the world, and, according to some, may predominate all over the other languages. Having one

language

Use synonyms

would certainly aid understanding, but there will

also

Linking Words

be some drawbacks. One evident benefit is that

language

Use synonyms

would not represent anymore a barrier, leading to a more effective and functional communication between people.

In other words

Linking Words

, because speaking with the locals and native people is part and parcel of travelling in foreign countries, it could be extremely difficult to ask and understand information.

Thus

Linking Words

, having a common way of expression would call off

this

Linking Words

linguistic impediment, helping people communicate efficiently.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, there are obvious disadvantages to having only a global terminology.

Firstly

Linking Words

, every

language

Use synonyms

, major or minor it could be, reflects the culture and the habits of that country, making every one of them unique and relevant with its own way of life.

For instance

Linking Words

, the

ethimology

a history of a word

etymology

is a field of the linguistic, which explains the origin and evolution of the words linked with the costumes of the region of that period. So, if there was a universal vocabulary, part of the country’s history would die. To sum up, while there are plus points to have a single dialect, too much would be lost

as a result

Linking Words

. English, as the only

language

Use synonyms

spoken globally, would lead people to communicate better without any linguistic barriers.

However

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

pro is weighed up by the cons that would demolish parts of countries’ history.