countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. to what extent do you agree and disagree.

Nowadays, the governments and public developers have been working hard to determine mix time allocation in their economies.

Although

there is a direct link between a long average working hours and productivities,

however I

Accept comma addition

however, I

still believe that

this

trend would lead to drawbacks which will be analysed in

this

essay. It is true that the spending a huge hours of employment would put employees' health at risk.

Firstly

, since the staffs cannot have time on their rest,

this

tendency reduces the relaxation and other activities,

such

as bedtime or travelling, which leads to risks of heart diseases, diabetes, stress.

As a result

, if the employees have to endure these situations a long hours, they would lose motivation and discouraging, which halts their working processes. Another compelling reason why

this

trend could be counterproductive as the economies will be at stake. The main effect is that since the humans do not have period of entertainment and other services that leads to low consumption and affects directly towards the recreational industries.

For example

, in japan, the citizens do not engage the social activities,

therefore

their entertainment industry is lowest rate all around the world.

Furthermore

, since

this

affects towards citizens' health extensively, the humans are more reliant on health care systems.

For instance

, If there is not any demands of medical treatment, the government funding will enhance a lot of infrastructure, which is environment conductive to the development of the economies. In conclusion,

although

this

cannot be denied of its benefits. But the governments and employers should still balance date allocation between employment and entertainment,

this

benefits not only the citizens but

also

the nations' economies.