Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio- diversity. What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity? What solutions can you suggest?

It is argued that someone that committed

murder

the guilty must be killed by the

death

penalty

, while some believed that it can make the society

also

become a

murder

for the suspect,

therefore

it is better to keep the

murder

alive in the prison.

This

essay agreed with the statement to give the murders a

second

chance

to live in the prison rather than to committing

death

penalty

because everyone has a right to stay alive and it will never enough to applying the 'revenge system' on

this

world. Everyone has a basic right to be alive, even if they are

murder

. As a human being, we have no right to judge and punish other people with a severe punishment because it is GOD authority. They deserved a

second

chance

to understand the wrong thing they have done.

Also

, there must be some reason behind the story that could be unknown.

For example

, if people committed as

murder

by protecting themselves, it cannot be judged for the

death

penalty

because it will be unfair.

Therefore

, They deserved a

second

chance

to be a better man.

Furthermore

, murdering with a

death

penalty

is just a small part of 'revenge system', which I believed would never be fitted in

this

world. Fairness always is a reason. A

murder

just killed someone, so they have to be killed too.

This

thought was wrong. To illustrate

this

thought was wrong is when there was not only one soul killed, it would not be fair to just kill the

murder

one time.

Thus

, the

death

penalty

would never be matched by the social system and have to be removed. In conclusion, a

murder

deserved to be given a

second

chance

to live their lives and be a better person because it is a part of human rights and the

death

penalty

will not be fair to everyone.