Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The continuous change and development of the world have been bringing different ideas and views in

architecture

.

This

shows thought that people have their freedom to express their

style

in designing their new own houses.

However

, many people think that it could be better to build new houses based on the already existing

style

of a local

area

. For me,

this

thought is the better choice. Following the

style

of an

area

in construction can remain the special

architecture

of the

area

.

Architecture

is part of the historical and cultural importance of a place. It is precious when new houses can inherit the typical specifications of

architecture

in their designs.

As a result

, the houses get the benefit of having the unique beauty of

architecture

bestowed on the local land after its many years of history. Homogeneity of landscape is another benefit that made newly built houses being outstanding. The homogeneity is not copying exactly the same as the old designs and being boring. It means well organizing space, well ventilating, and not irritating the beauty of the other houses.

For example

, it might be annoying when a golden glass skyscraper was built in a hot sunny

area

where almost all two-to-three-floor-houses took place. Its glass windows would reflect dazzling light and the heat of the sun into the houses below it. The classy golden skyscraper in personal

style

is no longer being beautiful in the eye of the affected houses nearby. To sum up, the remaining local

style

in the design of new houses is a good choice to express the unique beauty in terms of history and culture.

Moreover

, it makes sure that all new houses have enough space and a good atmosphere depending on the similarity of landscape.