Some people think they have the right much as fresh water they want, others believe government should control the use of water as it is limited resource. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.

There is an argument that centres on utilizing fresh

drink

by which to be limited by governments or use it as much as we want. Even though people have the right to use up rain for their lives, in my opinion, I believe that executive of

drink

should be under the control of governments. On the one hand, there is a long-standing debate in favour of supporters who argue that citizens should consume

water

whenever they need to. Essentially speaking, they believe that

water

is not a possession of the union and it with the nonsense that the politics controls the management of

drink

.

Additionally

, each individual household had a different situation and a number of family members; if the power regulates limited

water

for each family, the people will get stressed easily to consider their

water

consumption all the time. As a consequence, the life quality will rapidly decrease and it will cause some serious diseases as people cannot be supplied with fresh

water

at the right time. Take Australia as an example, in the rural area, Toowoomba, the authority implemented limited management of

water

for each household;

as a result

, a number of the residents left the town and moved to other states, which caused serious impacts on the community like the lack of workforce.

On the other hand

, I highly believe that the nation should control and supply an adequate level of cup to the public. Above all else, it is true that most countries have trouble in the scarcity of brew and they take

this

issue seriously in order to save a number of lives;

consequently

, controlling the

executive

Suggestion

execution

of

drink

is a feasible way for the sustainability of people's lives and even the other life forms on Earth. An excellent illustration for

this

is that most developed countries, namely Canada, the USA, and Australia had imposed strict

drink

regulation measures and have controlled the level of sip;

thus

, they have succeeded in saving a lump sum of money in terms of addressing glass shortage issues. On top of that, there is not enough fresh booze for the

next

generation in the future; if we consumed glass as much as we could without any consideration, it would be hard to get some fresh sip.

Last

but not least, the public would pay an expensive amount of price for one bottle of

cup

Suggestion

the cup

as a shortage of refreshment consuming. In conclusion,

although

some people insist that they have the right to use as much liquor they need, in my point-of-view, I am convinced that the ministry should restrict the administration of sip for the betterment of the future.