Nowadays newspapers publish information about the private lives of individuals. Some people think the government should maintain certain control over the information that gets published, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

At the outset of the new millennium, gazettes make public data about the personal lives of the folk. On

this

basis, an intelligent question to raise is why should

government

either limit or monitor personal

information

which are published by newspapers? If we flip the coin of contrasting ideas, which side will substantiate itself

first

? People rallying support for the

first

view argue

that albeit

Accept comma addition

that, albeit

, one of the main

newspapers duties

Accept comma addition

newspapers, duties

is covering new events throughout the society, but under no circumstances should make known people personal details;

since

Suggestion

Since

, everyone in every

societies ranging

Suggestion

society, ranging

society ranging

from children to adult citizens has their own privacy

;

Accept space

;

what is more, scarcely could journals substantiate their allegation; since, they have just received raw

information

by which

are provided

Suggestion

provides

inauthentic resources and mostly without compelling evidence; thereby, it might have endangered people’s

honor

bestow honor or rewards upon

honour

. The passionate advocates of

second

idea claim that not only should

government

authorities avoid imposing strict controls on the newspaper publishers’ activities, but

also

they should encourage them to keep on their career in order to cover all the new news which are taken place all around the community;

since

Suggestion

Since

, if publishers had not come out popular people or

authorities private

Accept comma addition

authorities, private

information

people would not have come across their real personalities. Our former president is a case in point, if local newspapers had revealed his personal attitude the citizens would not have never voted for him Judging objectively, before discussion could be proposed, the idea of both views had to be understood among people. I personally believe that

government

should control over the publishers if they intend to hurt people’s

honor

bestow honor or rewards upon

honour

deliberately.

to

Suggestion

To

play the magic, one unique measure to take is

government

strive to both get across individuals to preserve their own personal

information

and impose charges as a penalty for those who bring out people privacy on purpose./