Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent times, great levels of

inequality

among artists

has become

Suggestion

have become

a problem. Some people believe that

government

involvement is needed to ensure modern day artists are payed comparable wages for their works of art.

Although

inequality

among artists is a concern, I am of the opinion that the

government

should not decide who is or is not successful.

Inequality

in the arts industry leads to a number of problems.

First

of all, many talented artists with incredible potential do not go into the industry due to the fact that they may not be able to make a living.

For example

, if someone has the ability to draw or paint, they are more likely to move into graphic or website design because these careers are more reliable.

Secondly

,

this

inequality

means that most artists are unable to work on their passion full-time. Many artists must

work casual

Accept comma addition

work, casual

or part-time jobs just to make ends meet.

However

,

government

involvement in artist’s wages would be counterproductive. To ensure equality,

government

must

firstly

limit or lower the amount successful artists can make. Interfering in

this

way would mean that the best artists might not be able to

make

engage in

do

what the free market agrees they are worth.

Furthermore

, it is not necessarily unfair that certain artists make much more money than others. In most cases, the most talented artists are the most successful, and it is not the

government

’s job to limit

success

Suggestion

the success

. In conclusion, while it is not ideal that income

inequality

exists in the art community, I believe that it is not the

government

’s place to artificially control the amount of money an artist can make.