Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?

These days, some cities without enough

land

to build house provide housing by taller building for people who work in the

city

. Other cities which have a wider

area

of the

land

build house.

This

essay will give both advantage and my opinion. The greatest advantage of housing by taller buildings can provide a great many people who live or work in the big cities. Many companies located in the central of the

city

.

Therefore

, People who worked in the company want to live near their company.

However

, the

city

without enough housing

area

can not build many houses and provide it for people. If the cities make the housing

area

by

Suggestion

with

taller buildings, they provide a great many houses for people who want to live in the

city

easily.

On the other hand

, other cities which have a wider

area

of

land

tend to build the house and provide private areas

such

as garden and parking. Most cities with wider

land

locate in the rural region and have not many companies like the cities. For the reason, the cities in the countryside have a great deal of huge

land

to build the building.

Moreover

, they can provide larger housing areas than home areas by taller building for a great many people.

Therefore

, they need not provide housing areas by taller building. In conclusion, sometimes, we need a great many houses in the large

city

. For the reason, I think that the big cities without enough

land

have to make housing by taller buildings.

However

, a

city

located in the countryside does not need to create housing areas by building.