The air we breathe has a major impact on our health and the environment. However, the air pollution is constantly growing and at current level it can be fought only globally. that is to say, individual efforts to improve air quality will not give any results, and it is solely responsibility of our governments to reduce air pollution. Do you agree or disagree?

With the increasing condition of pollutants existed in the breath and non-negligible effect of them on our health and atmosphere most countries are struggling for clean breeze.

although

Suggestion

Although

I believe that the power has the upper hand in reducing wind, pollution, individuals

also

play a vitally important role in

this

responsibility. On the one hand, the rulers of countries have all the means in order to control and drop the pollution rate so they can easily persuade the chairman of most car companies to produce high standard vehicles with the lowest possible pollutant or in some cases even pollutant-free production.

Furthermore

, all broadcasting facilitates is under the control of the ministry which indicates that they are able to raise public awareness about some subjects

such

as global warming and how to maintain clean air.

Finally

, legislating some rules and regulation which is the most noticeable power of governors give them the ability to improve the breath quality.

for

Suggestion

For

example, in USA ministers impose some sort of rules to stop people using gasoline in hot days.

On the other hand

, despite all the facilities and abilities that the law has, improving the breeze quality mission is not achievable.

however

Suggestion

However

, By the aid of people, the succession probability will increase because they are the exact force that governments have to carry out their tasks and projects and without people, they are just inoperative.

consequently

Suggestion

Consequently

, apart from what measures governments are taking into action, they should have people acceptance to make it viable.

for

Suggestion

For

example in UK regime implement some sort of rules to stop people consuming electrical power in the summer. In conclusion, I agree that the state's responsibilities in providing chemical-free habitat is imperative, but It is not sufficient to make it, so with the cooperation of citizens and rule reaching

this

goal is highly likely