Countries should restrict foreign companies from opening offices and factories in order to protect local business. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is irrefutable that the government needs to put restrictions on international firms to open their branches and industries to safeguard the native employment. In my opinion, I do agree with
this
Linking Words
notion because the extension of foreign trades in another country is leaving a deleterious impact on their domestic market.
To begin
Linking Words
with, the judiciary has to enhance the task transition policy when any multinational organization set up their offices in another country. To be more precise, every year innumerable firms
such
Linking Words
as chemicals, automobiles, textiles, and call centers established their functional unit to promote their business in many nations, and
also
Linking Words
advertise their brands on a large scale,
therefore
Linking Words
, the exsisting local markets of a country suffers a lot because people preffer to purchase big brands,
hence
Linking Words
, the domestic products face a great fall in their production and later on it diminish from the market forever.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, to prevent the national goods, the administration department needs to regulate the certain guidelines so that both the national and international companies can perpetuate their task without any interruption. Simply stated, multinational firms should be allowed to capture the limited sector
instead
Linking Words
of a whole industrial area,
thus
Linking Words
the home firms,
for instance
Linking Words
, cotton and silk weaving, carpet making, leather and metalwork industries can
also
Linking Words
thrive their products in the retail sector.
Moreover
Linking Words
, a separate budget should be allocated to them to stimulate their domain.
This
Linking Words
practice would assist both the type of companies to work for a longer period of time. In conclusion, I do not but agree that it is imperative to put stringent rules and regulations on foreign organizations to safe the native occupation of a state as the expansion of theses offices are leaving an adverse effect on their origin companies.
Submitted by Rashme on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
    What to do next:
    Look at other essays: