Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion.

Human activities have contaminated the pure and pious nature of flora and fauna around the globe. Some people want to participate in discovering ways for changing the harmful after effects, while others neglect the fact that the ray of improvement is possible. Human involvement is the constant process of bettering themselves and the world and

this

process can accumulate enough resources to rectify the loss.

This

essay will reach a conclusion, after discussing both facets. To initiate, the pattern of ever-increasing population in the world, call for more land and food resources to be cultivated.

This

leaves us with no other alternative than to cut down trees and take away shelter for birds and use

this

land to produce food and make houses.

Moreover

, what multiplies to

this

concern is, in

this

technological and industrial era, the lifestyle of human constantly revolve around mobiles phones, tablets, wireless - whose signals affect birds, cars and machines that ramps up the air pollution, and industries whose waste adulterate the air, water and soil; Declares there are minimal chances of positive chances in near future.

Secondly

, the factors that can speed up the process of negating the negative impact is, awareness and confining of routine harmful activities. Celebrities and sportsmen could be used to endorse a harmless lifestyle towards nature; they can have

such

powerful impact and motivation which can move stubborn minds as well.

For example

, Leonardo DiCaprio, the actor, mentioned to save the global planet in his Oscar winning speech, and it has been confirmed that

this

has influenced his fans participating in planting more trees; whose effects were recently encountered by the World Environmental Organization, as the reduction in size of the hole ozone layer.

Furthermore

, the government authorities should

also

be made responsible for enacting laws towards the environment. The rule of one tree few square meters is made compulsory within a country, it can have a marvellous strike in regaining the astonishing environment. After travelling both paths, the way that leads to change and the one that does not, I opine with the latter, as it has been established that the later is more significant for the benefits of present and future earth.

Although

, there seem a million routes to deteriorate the negative impact on birds and animals, a billion more ways could be sculpted by evolving human minds to rejuvenate the advancing world environment.